My girlfriend has actually got "Dr" Gillian McKeith's 'You Are What You Eat". The recipes are pretty good, but they are dressed up in so much pseudoscientific quackery puts us off a bit. Of course, maybe we're missing the point. Quackery aside, the food is genuinely pretty good for you. I can't agree with her views on eating meat - I grew up on a farm and have seen the entire process of raising animals for meat from conception to plate, pretty much all my life, and I try not to eat anything I ddn't know personally. Perhaps we're missing the point. Perhaps there's something clever going on here that we haven't spotted. *Maybe* dressing up healthy eating in such terms (actually I can't find the book, my girlfriend might have it, or I'd give examples) - maybe that's a way to get people to buy into eating healthily. I can see how it would appeal to a certain sector of society: "Look, this woman on the TV says it's good for you and I don't understand it and she's a doctor, so it must be good!" Me personally, I favour a diet consisting of less processed crap. Real food, real bread, real ale, real wine. You are what you eat? Well, I'm full-fat, full-caffeine, full-strength, wholegrain with subtle hoppy notes and a clean fruity aftertaste. And that's how I like it.