|
||||
|
Re: Defensive Medicine (C-Spine Immobilisation)
by
24601
Ah, to collar or not to collar!
I hate the bloody things, and as far as I'm aware research has shown that they are of very little benefit except in a few very specific circumstances (e.g. unconscious with high index of suspicion for a spinal injury).
As Tom says, applying them can cause more injuries than it helps to treat. The boards inparticular carry a high risk of pressure damage, back pain etc., and often make it more difficult to extricate/treat the patient (thus leading to treatment delays for other injuries, and therefore potential harm).
Most people who are involved even in high risk incidents don't infact have a spinal injury (for example, I read some research recently that showed that only ~8% of people thrown at speed from a motorbike have any spinal compromise). There is little evidence to suggest that in those who do have a spinal injury, immobilisation actually prevents deterioration.
Almost everything we do in this area of care is based on ritual, shaky opinion and defensive medicine. We'd be best to do away with spinal immobilisation altogether.
|
Welcome to Random Acts Of Reality, a Blog based in London, England, written by an E.M.T working for the London Ambulance Service. Also, number one search result for "Womble porn". All names have be changed to protect the guilty. This Blog was previously known as "Why I Hate Humanity" but the antipsychotic medication seems to have kicked in.
All opinions on this website are mine alone, and may not reflect those of the L.A.S or other ambulance crews Find out more about me here.
Login
Search
Categories
This Month
Month Archive
Buy My Book (Please)
The Story So Far.
Reynolds is Reading...
Some Of My Favourites
![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
|
|||

