It's perhaps worth pointing out also that the article (BBC website) is reporting what the witnesses told the inquest - the reporter does not appear to be directly critising the ambulance workers. Of course, i fully accept that if they don't give equal prominance to the evidence given by the ambulance/police as to why the man wasn't taken to hospital then a false impression is given but this does appear to be fairy 'straight' reporting of waht the witness said, not necessarily endorsing or agreeing with it. Just occasionally they are NOT out to get you!