I'm not sure about the ruling but I think there is a fundamental point that is dogging teh interweb. If we assume that people won't pay anything for music (or many other things) then other than for the love of it, why would anyone make music ? How is the artist to eat ? I appreciate that there is stuff out there, often put out by big record companies, that you might consider rubbish but someone else probably loves it and yet all these musicians need to earn money at some point. The argument that the industry is to blame for not embracing online music doesn't wash either - if it costs money then significant numbers of people will carry on stealing it. Maybe I'm old fashioned, I prefer bying music on CD after all, but until I can take bread for free from Sainsburys then I don't get to take music for free from musicians. /rant