I would imagine in this day and age you are recorded in hospitals most days with the in house cctv systems. You are never asked to provide your consent for this filming to take place. The recording has probably been out sourced to a third party. Yet in this case it has been reported that the relatives of the individuals concerned gave their consent. So I am at a loss if client confidentiality was not breached as she had consent, why was she struck off? Is it another failing of the system? I wonder what will happen if she decides to take it further and go legal. What will we have next in nanny land - censorship?